My VD and Log

[Joost27]

So, things have gotten tight this last month or so. I had to make some choices and I chose to make some quick cash selling my CS TMIC, SURE SRI, and a tons of old protege parts. Everything else on the MS6 has stayed. Leaving the HTP 2.5" TIP, M2 catted DP, Turbo Manifold, 07+ Cold pipe we opened up the pinch point on, CS HPFP, Methanol and AP.

I initially went back to a OTS map from what I had been running. And soon was disappointed and questioned why I bothered, as all I had was a few intake side restrictions from before. So I loaded up the old map and pulled a little timing and boost and did some pulls and then started adding it back. Right now, this is where I am at.

This is my VD plot


And log is attached. Feeling pretty good about it so far. Any input or tips other than buying some parts...

[sheston]

Looks pretty good. My only suggestion might be to make the timing advance more linear, ie. fill it out in the mid rpm range.

I big on pushing it, so I would add some WGD and get a little more boost mid band as well :-)

[MSMS3]

I notice that the VD was done with Dynojet correction. Has Barnhill (developer of VD) finally gotten the correction factor right?

I know we have all been using 1.01 CF for a long time to make our VD charts more closely reflect chassis dyno numbers. Just wondering. I'm still using 1.01.

[Joost27]

oh, Idk. been using dynojet CF all along. They still have it at 1.09. I guess comparing to others here it would matter, but for seeing progress as i make adjustments it should be fine as it is still comparing apples to apples.

Here is the same log with CF 1.01

[Boost_creep]

I've found that MS6's actually turn out to be closer to Dynojet, while MS3's are closer to 1.01 CF.

[MSMS3]

My bad. Failed to notice it was MS6. Also good to know 1.01 is still the standard CF for MS3.

[Joost27]

More Timing and More Boost. Although I think I need to play with WGDC a bit more in the mid-high area, as it dips a bit. But, I dont have much more room to go, so I may be SOL.

Both Runs were done on the same section of road in similar temps (33*F vs 34*F last night) maybe a couple gallons less fuel though.