Stock dp, stock cbe, pd tuned 304whp

[2010REDMS3]

been re working the tune with pd and pulled a whopping 304whp! mods in sig, no clue how i did it but im good with it!

[Code Monkey]

Why did you lower the redline?

[2010REDMS3]

I just didn't go to red line on the pulls

[Cheapspeed]

Originally Posted by 2010REDMS3 I just didn't go to red line on the pulls

Why not?

Most K04's drop off towards redline. I was confused by your graph initially because I thought it was odd that your HP stayed steady by the end of the log, k04's drop off towards redline.

[2010REDMS3]

Idk just didn't go to red line lol I figured roughly 6k would be good enough to collect data off of

[sharksinspace]

Damn son; I thought 300hp took a a downpipe at least, and usually also e85 or meth.

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by sharksinspace Damn son; I thought 300hp took a a downpipe at least, and usually also e85 or meth.

Right?!! I think there may have been an error with Vdyno or something lol this just doesn't seem feasible to me lol

[MRR]

Originally Posted by 2010REDMS3 been re working the tune with pd and pulled a whopping 304whp! mods in sig, no clue how i did it but im good with it!

With a better turbo and a DP it should take you close to 400 hp

[Mmahan3510]

those are some pretty sweet numbers, im not making but a couple more hp and tq with full bolt ons and e85!

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by Mmahan3510 those are some pretty sweet numbers, im not making but a couple more hp and tq with full bolt ons and e85!

we had an oddly cold day here in FL last week when I did the pulls, my BAT's were mid 70's which helped out ALOT. lol

[DC2]

Thats just great !

[texasboy21]

VD dyno, take the numbers with a grain of salt.

[sharksinspace]

Originally Posted by texasboy21 VD dyno, take the numbers with a grain of salt.

Even so, CF is 1.01 and smoothing 3, so it should be fairly well in line with most of the figures we see, shouldn't it? I haven't used VDyno too much yet, so please enlighten me if there's something I'm overlooking.

[blackms3_71]

Slightly down hill would be my guess.

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by blackms3_71 Slightly down hill would be my guess.

No, just the straightest flattest road I could find lol, there could've been an error in the datalog or the program I honestly think im between 275-285whp

[shaneski]

Sometimes what looks to be a dead flat road can be anything but. There's a google height data page you can click on any road at different intervals and see if it is decline or incline. I used it on a few roads i thought was flat and ended up with it having a steady incline of 6ft over 500 meters

[MRR]

It looks like the best way to get a more accurate log is to take a log on both direction (forward and return) and average the result.

[Vansquish]

Post the datalog for that pull.

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by Vansquish Post the datalog for that pull.

i think its these ones, ive been emailing datalogs back and forth with my tuner and I haven't been labeling them so these might be them but they might not be lol

[MD1032]

Meh, it is what it is. Vdyno is never going to be 100% accurate but it's good enough to see coarse differences between maps, for example, the shit OTS maps versus the real deal custom tune. At the end of the day an optimized tune with x level of hardware is always going to generate somewhere in the realm of a certain level of power. When you roll race, usually that's when the hardware differences show up. For example even a catless DP car, otherwise identical hardware, tuned at the same power level, would eek out a win a roll race because the turbo spools slightly faster.

@2010REDMS3; did you set all of the throttle position cells in the csv file to 75 before importing into vdyno? It looks like there's interference from throttle fluctuations in your vdyno, caused by the load system pulling throttle position during turbo spool-up.

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by MD1032 Meh, it is what it is. Vdyno is never going to be 100% accurate but it's good enough to see coarse differences between maps, for example, the shit OTS maps versus the real deal custom tune. At the end of the day an optimized tune with x level of hardware is always going to generate somewhere in the realm of a certain level of power. When you roll race, usually that's when the hardware differences show up. For example even a catless DP car, otherwise identical hardware, tuned at the same power level, would eek out a win a roll race because the turbo spools slightly faster. @2010REDMS3; did you set all of the throttle position cells in the csv file to 75 before importing into vdyno? It looks like there's interference from throttle fluctuations in your vdyno, caused by the load system pulling throttle position during turbo spool-up.

I sure didn't I'll try doing that then run it through Vdyno again

[Vansquish]

Sorry, bud. I don't believe your numbers at all. I plugged your logs into VDyno with the same weight, correction factor, tire size, gearing, and car, and the results were completely different.

[2010REDMS3]

Originally Posted by Vansquish Sorry, bud. I don't believe your numbers at all. I plugged your logs into VDyno with the same weight, correction factor, tire size, gearing, and car, and the results were completely different.

Lol looks like something went wrong on my end then eh lol those numbers look low as fuck too lol

[shaneski]

Originally Posted by 2010REDMS3 Lol looks like something went wrong on my end then eh lol those numbers look low as fuck too lol

Not low at all considering your engine is no longer new and stock exhaust etc is probably around 210-215whp with OEM tune

[Vansquish]

If you really did just input the data directly into Vdyno, then the only thing I can think of is that your version of VDyno (1.3.1) and mine (1.2.7) are different. I can't seem to download the newer version (the website appears to be down), so I'm not sure how to test that theory.

[Gerbilo]

Originally Posted by Vansquish If you really did just input the data directly into Vdyno, then the only thing I can think of is that your version of VDyno (1.3.1) and mine (1.2.7) are different. I can't seem to download the newer version (the website appears to be down), so I'm not sure how to test that theory.

Tested it for ya on 1.3.1, same story.

VD.jpg

[texasboy21]

Time to edit the sig.