![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
| |||||||
|
Welcome to Mazdaspeed Forums . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. *When you join MSF as a registered user, there will be No Ads. *Registered Members get access to the Off Topic Area of the Forum *Registered Members have an opportunity to upgrade their accounts to VIP, which brings a host of goddies for supporting MSF such as Raffles, Additional Forum Access, More PM Storage, The ability to upload more Images and many other enhancements. *Registered members also get access to the live chat box! |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() | | #1 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: May 2013 Location: chattanooga
Posts: 65
(View Stats)
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 38
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Groans: 11
Groaned at 10 Times in 5 Posts
(Thread Starter) | Not Ranked : 0 score So I'v had my car for about 2 years now and it's been great. A few months after I picked it up I ran it on a dyno bone stock. Since then I'v done a few things, (cobb accessport, cobb intake, cpe rmm, and running the stage 1 sf 93 oct tune) I'v been fiddling around with the virtual dyno on AP and have found a road to do what I think is a pretty decent test. Of course I know it's not accurate and there are times when I get 800hp readings but I'v run my datalogs through a program called virtual dyno as well and it's giving me what I would think (roughly) I'd be getting from an intake and tune. p.s. I have no idea if it would effect anything but since I'v owned the car I'v ran 93 octane 100% gas, so no ethanol. first is my stock dyno sheet (keep in mind it's on a dynojet and was about 50 degrees outside) next is my datalog in 4th gear after being put through Virtual dyno. The reason (I think) I'm getting such low hp numbers compared to tq is I'm running out of room to pull all the way through the rpm range, but if I had to take an uneducated guess I'd put it around peaking at 260ish. Last is my datalog itself for those curious. (done today its about 68 and sunny) Why am I posting this? because I no longer have access to my orginal dyno (business went under) and want to be able to track my progress. Also I figured it would be good to show people who are looking to get a little power but not do a major build what that can expect, and if any of the experienced folks on here want to chime in if I'm way off base with my readings or have any suggestions they're welcome to do so. |
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| True Dyno Numbers Cobb OTS 93 STG2 vs. Pro-tune | WRX_Fan_0717 | 2010 MS3 - Dyno Sheets/Discussions | 10 | 07-17-2013 09:39 AM |
| stock dyno -> stg2 dyno | BLAKK | 2010 MS3 - Dyno Sheets/Discussions | 2 | 03-19-2013 05:40 PM |
| Stock dyno numbers | Ace99899 | Gen2 MS3 General Discussion | 9 | 10-19-2011 05:36 AM |
| Dyno Cobb AP ver103 stage 1+ vs stock | ccann26 | MazdaSpeed 3/6 - Dyno Sheets/Discussions | 5 | 03-03-2009 05:25 AM |