![]() |
HTP 3.5 full intake installed 4 Attachment(s) So after about 2 hours I finally got the 3.5 inch full intake installed. The quality is great as well as the price. As far as installation goes it was pretty straight forward. I highly recommend picking up @HTP; small battery tray and installing it all at the same time. I did not do this and it is a tight fit. One recommendation I have is it get an angled fitting for the small house as well I am not sure what this goes to off the top of my head. Also so clamps for the valve cover vent hose would be nice. The vc vent hose was a bit to long cut it like three times but that's not a bad thing per say. I will update this later with power and airflow gains once I get the maf dialed in. As far as what I did to get the car started I just multiplied both maf cal tables by 1.66. It stuttered for about a minute initially but then ran smooth Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD |
Subbin for gains. |
Nice.. Looks like the fitment is better than the JBR (from pics at least)... what is the price on these? |
If it fits, it's better than some other 3.5" intakes |
Quote:
It does fit well my battery box is a bit distorted though won't snap back together just right but I believe that is because of my positive wire not being in just right. It makes your car so much louder though. I no reason to run vta with this thing stock bpv sounds like a bov with it Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD |
What are you comparing the sound to? I'm replacing my corksport with the JBR and my inner ricer wonders if I'll lose any noise :dance: |
Quote:
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD |
Gotcha... I noticed the same thing when I put the CS on. Couldn't believe how much the stocker muffled things. |
Also interested in price and gains. Didnt see anything on HTPs site about this. |
Quote:
The way the got the air straightener built in is awesome Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD |
Quote:
|
Very nice. @HTP; is there any discount if we buy this intake and your battery box at the same time? Like a combo package. |
Quote:
I would still say using @HTP; battery tray would give you the best fitment possible |
3 Attachment(s) Well i got some preliminary results in. Obviously my tune needs some work still. The larger intake has caused me to start overboosting again, i had the majority of the worked out before i put the intake on. My maf cal is still way off so dont be alarmed by the AFR's it was a cool enough day I felt i could do a couple woot pulls without getting in trouble. Comparing the two attached logs i picked up 25 HP and 9 torque. I am curious to see how much of that is because of the over boosting i have at the moment, but thought i would post this up anyway. Also these are on different roads on different days so its hard to tell. The gain could also be from lower BATS. |
Is it a custom order kinda thing? Im not seeing it on their website. tappy tap |
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Katie |
Quote:
Check them out here Thanks! Katie |
@Deldran the fact that it's a 1 piece thing, does it cause any troubles with the engine movement? That's my only concern... |
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
@Deldran Well with the engine movement.... If you were to have a TIP in silicone + an elbow along with the maf housing, the silicone could "absorb" some of the movement. And if you had an aluminum TIP + a silicone elbow that connects to the maf housing, once again, the silicone could absorb a portion of the movement since silicone is flexible Now since it's a one piece all the way, the only part that could absorb some of the engine movement is the coupling to the turbo; therefore **it could** create tension to it and it would be easier to disconnect from it. Sorry if my explanation sucks, english isn't my native language.... Hope you get my point / question anyway! |
Its attached to the engine, it moves with the engine, its not attached to the body in any way so there is not need to worry about energy absorbtion... and even if it was, that just means you need to drop some cash on mounts. :smashfreakB: |
Quote:
edit: El_Diablo beat me to it! |
Yeah that's what I was thinking too; just that someone on another forum pointed this out... and I do have a 2.5 TIP from HTP and it is connected onto the engine about halfway with the inlet bracket. So the one piece intake system should be the same.... I used to have a CAI on my old celica 6th gen and it was only "secured" by the coupler that connects to the TB. It was always moving and disconnecting... 'had to ty-wrap tuning style that shit |
Quote:
|
If one silicone coupler can hold over 30psi, I think you'll be fine with it supporting a lb or two. |
Quote:
|
Yeah, that's an option. I'm sure it's fine without the bracket, and I wouldn't want to dick up the finish. |
2 Attachment(s) Got my HTP battery tray and picked up a battery today. It looks sexy should be able to put it in tomorrow Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
|
Installed a JBR 3.5" onto a local Nator members car and it was rubbing his battery box with the ECU relocated. Its a tight fit. |
How did you guys get around the coolant line in front of turbo? Over or under? Did you push it back any off the connection at the block? Or left it be? I noticed I can get it to slide off nearly 1/4" for a bit of added room. |
That heater core line is a pain in the ass. Keep it under the intake. Some people slide the hose back on the fitting, some setups its not a problem and they leave it alone. On our test cars I install a Gates 28604 ($2.99) coolant hose connector and a few inches of 5/8" hose to give the proper clearance. Matt |
Quote:
|
|
Imo, the bpv hose does a good job of holding the intake "up". Not much movement between it and the valve cover breather hose. |
1 Attachment(s) Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vB.Sponsors