![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
|
| |||||||
| Ford Focus ST Ecoboost - General Discussion Discussion of Ford Ecoboost Engines |
|
Welcome to Mazdaspeed Forums . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. *When you join MSF as a registered user, there will be No Ads. *Registered Members get access to the Off Topic Area of the Forum *Registered Members have an opportunity to upgrade their accounts to VIP, which brings a host of goddies for supporting MSF such as Raffles, Additional Forum Access, More PM Storage, The ability to upload more Images and many other enhancements. *Registered members also get access to the live chat box! |
![]() |
| | | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
![]() | | #1 | ![]() |
| Police - Grammarhead ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,281
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 3747 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 8,744
Thanked 7,036 Times in 2,826 Posts
Groans: 1,911
Groaned at 45 Times in 26 Posts
(Thread Starter) | So, it looks like the new EcoBoost 2.3L will hav 275bhp/300lb-ft when it hits the market in the Lincoln MKC. It's interesting that the outputs are so close to the 2.0, and the MZR DISI. It'll be interesting to see how different the design is from the DISI. 2015 Lincoln MKC: This Is It
__________________ Having trouble finding something on MSF? Use MS3Shadow's search tool:SEARCH MSF HERE! |
| | |
![]() | | #2 | ![]() |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: St. Johns, Canada
Posts: 1,436
(View Stats)
iTrader: (2)
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 2,014
Thanked 1,762 Times in 645 Posts
Groans: 56
Groaned at 6 Times in 6 Posts
| Not Ranked : 0 score That's a lot lower output than I would have expected. It'll be interesting to see if output changes much in other applications, because right now it's kind of disappointing.
__________________ 2008.5 CWP: GTX 3071//Rapebuilt EM//Relentless pnp IM//JBR 3.5" WP//TurboXS DP/RP//TR8C/Cobb FMIC//GFS bpv//JBR 88/70/70a//Eibach Pro Kit//Koni Yellows//JBR RSB//RX8's Awaiting Install: DO Stage 2//3 Bar MAP//CPe Safeseals Winter Beater: 96 GMC K1500 5 speed 4x4 Needed: Driver mod [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to BigRedSpecial For This Useful Post: | Vansquish (11-13-2013) |
![]() | | #3 | ![]() |
| Police - Grammarhead ![]() Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 7,281
iTrader: (1)
Rep Power: 3747 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thanks: 8,744
Thanked 7,036 Times in 2,826 Posts
Groans: 1,911
Groaned at 45 Times in 26 Posts
(Thread Starter) | I tend to agree. 275/300 sounds like it's been set up to be a direct competitor for Cadillac's 2.0T (272/260) rather than an out-and-out performance motor. Given that the Focus ST is already somewhat underrated from the showroom, in order to actually differentiate between the two motors, FoMoCo is going to have to do something to crank up the output. I mean, I've seen a fair number of dyno charts that are in the ~235-245whp/~260-270wtq range, stock. That equates to around 265-275bhp/290-305lb-ft at the crank. Assuming this "ricer-math is accurate, the 2.3 will have to produce a lot more than that if it's going to be in the Mustang and in the ST versions of larger cars like the Fusion. Basically if we assume a 5%-9% understatement from Ford, like it's done with the 2.0 ST engine, that works out to about ~290-300whp/~315-325wtq for the 2.3 I'd be OK with those outputs as a starting point.
__________________ Having trouble finding something on MSF? Use MS3Shadow's search tool:SEARCH MSF HERE! |
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Report: Next Lincoln MKS to get 2.9L EcoBoost, nine-speed transmission? | Haltech | Automotive News | 0 | 08-28-2013 04:00 PM |
| Review: 2013 Lincoln MKS EcoBoost | Haltech | Automotive News | 0 | 11-13-2012 10:20 AM |
| First Drive: 2010 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost and MKS EcoBoost | Haltech | Automotive News | 0 | 05-15-2009 10:20 AM |
| New 2010 Lincoln MKS with EcoBoost to start at $47,760* | Haltech | Automotive News | 0 | 05-15-2009 07:20 AM |
| Detroit 2009: Lincoln MKS latest to get EcoBoost V6 | Haltech | Automotive News | 1 | 01-12-2009 04:29 PM |